The Assessment of Truth and False Claims of Postmodernism in International Relations ‎

Various and conflicting theories in international relations made by each of them claim to have more explanatory power. And in fact all of them claim to truth and better explanation and more comprehensive international relations and international phenomena. postmodernism as a theory of international relations, international relations discipline, doubt and thinkers of the that eras, with genealogy and deconstruction went to the international phenomena and, accordingly, many of the fundamentals of existence, ontological, epistemological and ontological perspectives dominate international relations, namely, realism and neorealism have questioned, is not an exception. Since the theory to prove its truth or falsity depend meta-theory, the aim of this article is to determine the truth and power of explanation and understanding, assessment and evaluation of the postmodern theory of international relations. This article emphasizes that, although postmodernism new horizons before researchers could open up the field of international relations, but assumptions of ontological, epistemological and methodological inconsistencies and internal contradictions faced by the theory of chaos and so many ideas Suffers.