The Compare the histories of Iqbal and Pirnia

Historical writing in Iran was roughly one-and-a-half century before and before Iranian acquaintance with the new Western culture and civilization. However, from time to time, historians such as Beyhaghi and others used the method of scientific critique more precisely in terms of the facts and the facts. However, most historians, based on the previous tradition, were able to conceive of the eventuality of the past historians, it may be possible to imagine that either the tradition of historicity was on the same lines or through the social and social unconsciousness or cowardice, or because of lack of understanding of the meaning of events And the events watched some incidents and their perceptions.
From the thirteenth century to the present, a new trend emerged in the history of history, which continued until now. Since the beginning of Qajar, there has been a new stream of historiography, one of the manifestations of Iran's encounter with Western civilization.
In this research, it is attempted to compare the historiography of two contemporary historians, Hassan Pirnia and Abbas Iqbal, due to the comparison that some of Persiania's conservative nationalists, as one of the oldest methods of historiography While this is not really the case, despite the fact that Pirnia has taken a great step in formulating the history of ancient Iran, it has not taken a step towards the development of historical insights and theorizing on history, and it seems that the late Abbas Iqbal has taken more effective steps in this regard.