The Use of History Deconstruction Theory in the Clarification of Plurality of Readings of the Succession of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH); Case Study of the Narrations by Yaqubi, Tabari, Sheikh E- Mofid

The Plurality of readings of the succession of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) and the redevelopment of this plurality in the disputes over the theological trends of Muslims have provided the ground for the plan of clarifying the plurality of historical readings of this matter and it is the consequence of the evident consideration of reconstructive beliefs of the logic of historical thinking based on the presumption of the article. In view of the author, the history deconstruction theory presents a sufficient clarification from the plurality of historical readings due to putting emphasis on the active role of historians related to the way of investigating the historical narrations and denying the referential identity of the logic of historical thinking. The method of the author in verifying this claim is the study of narrations by Tabari, Yaqubi and Sheikh e- Mofid, so that it will be a guide towards the clarification of the why and how of variation in the Prophet Mohammad’s proposals about the leadership after his majesty in Hajjatolveda. The finding from the comparison of narrations by Tabari, Yaqubi and Sheikh e- Mofid illustrates that the difference in the way of considering the act and speech of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) in Hajjatolveda is the result of presumption of the authors and their distinguished positions in social relations