Review the Viewpoints of Islamic Thinkers about Recitation of the Holy Qur'an with Ghana

"Recitation of the Qur'an with Ghana" is one of the controversial issues among Islamic scholars, among the controversies about the "recitation of the Qur'an with Ghana" is a brief overview of the definition of "Ghana", which resulted in a difference in the ruling, if the Islamic scholars first clearly outlined the subject and the scope of Ghana, the difference would be very small. Considering the importance of this issue as well as being involved with it, it is attempted in this research to first examine the concept of "Ghana" with an analytical descriptive method, then the views of Islamic thinkers should be reviewed. There are two major views on the Qur'anic changes. Those who believe that it is forbidden to prove their views on verses, narrations, rational arguments, and consensus that this evidence is corrupted. Ultimately, what proves to be proven by this evidence is the reverence of the Qur'an as a matter of fact and they are not absolute enough to respect the Qur'an. Those who recite the Qur'an with Ghana are cited by the Quranic, narrative and rational proofs. With this evidence, one can prove the permissibility of the "Change of Quran". The result of this study is that Ghana, in the sense of absolute singing, is partially permissible in the Holy Qur'an, and the rational and narrative arguments confirm this view.