An Investigation into New Logic of Perspective of Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology

The linguistic turn has played the central role in the rise of analytic philosophy. It was simply based on the idea that although a thought is explained through sentences, it will be more simple and reliable. But by after procedures, this view was specified and settled that thoughts cannot be explicated before being uttered in language. It means that the thought or the meaning cannot be grasped other than in terms of the syntax of expression and its relationship to the reference and the truth. Frege practically furthered the latter idea when he laid the foundations of arithmetics. He presented the theoretical principles of the idea in the first volume of his book, introducing different ways of reasoning in the second volume based on what he had in the First volume as the theoretical principles of the idea. On the contrary, Husserl’s view of logic not only did not reflect the relation between language and thought, but it considered language as merely something that can pass on the meaning to others. The view is based on the idea that meaning may be considered priority language and object. Simply, by Prolegomena and Logical investigations, Husserl first explains the relation between the pure categories ( as the pure theories of senses ) together, as he called it the theory of pure form of pluralities as pure form of manifold, and then explains the theory of the field of objects in terms of the early. Therefore, Frege’s way of explaining logic is radically different from that of Husserl. Accordingly, contrary to Dummett’s claim, each of these philosophical thoughts has a different origin, and contrary to Smith, woodruff‘s calm the “Fregean” interpretation of Husserl’s theory of sense cannot be possible.