Comparison of Educational Components of the New Philosophy of Richard Rorty's Versatility with the Educational Philosophy of Islam

The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences between the attitudes that are most influential in the philosophy of education and learning, namely, the neo-pragmatism of the rover, and, consequently, pragmatism in the western world, especially in the United States, and comparing it with the educational methods derived from the teachings of Islam. The research methodology is qualitative and utilizes library and Internet resources. Based on the research done, it has been shown that the principle of educational philosophy of intransigence is the denial of truth of language truth and the truth of truth, and thus to fill the gaps that cause relativity for It is a matter of principle that this disparity is explained by the fact that one can not explain the individual's origin to the community of a comprehensive educational philosophy, so it proposes the construction of the new language, which is an ideal design. And this is because the future of the future can not be the basis for a philosophy of education that proposes practical principles. Therefore, it should be noted that many studies that are being carried out in the current Iranian educational system and suggesting that new educational philosophies be used to replace educational and literary methods in Iran have many drawbacks. Consequently, without studying the main aspects of any kind of Western philosophy of education and comparing it with the educational philosophy of Islam, which has been many years of humanity and attention to its worldly and spiritual dimensions, can not be a copy for the methods of education in Iran got Although at first glance, these educational methods are applied and effective in Western countries, and the founding thinkers of these schools have a global image and philosophers.