“The study of the opinions of the scholars of Islamic jurisprudence bases in the principle of Reconcilement”

One of the most important issues in the Islamic jurisprudence bases in the problem of conflict of the reasons that has always occupied a chapter in the books of the subject among the issues of which are the ways of reconcilement the true understanding and analysis of which can guarantee the accurate application of the Islamic orders. The principle of Reconcilement applies between two reasons the validity of which is complete (in terms of both the document and the implication) and at the first glance they seem to be contradictory but reconcilement of them is better than rejecting them. The controversy about the principle usually arises about two matters: 1. what kind reconcilement is meant by Reconcilement? 2. What are the proofs of it? One kind of the reconcilement is reasonless reconcilement that is solving the conflict between the two reasons with no evidences. But this principle does not include this kid of reconcilement, since it refers to qualitative justifications for validity of which we have no proof; otherwise there were never conflicts between reasons at all. Another kind of reconcilement is the practical one that is partial application of the both conflicting reasons. This one is also out of inclusion of the principle; since it leads to definite disobedience of the both the reasons and entails a kind of chaos in jurisprudence. Therefore, the customary reconcilement is intended by the principle. Customary reconcilement is a reconcilement in accordance with the language rules and accepted by the people of the language and the community. They have argued by the Qur’an, tradition, logic and the manner of the intellectual to prove this principle.