Comparative study of Ibn-e-Sina and Mulla Sadra's view on the process of rational perception

The rational perceptions have always been one of the issues of interest to Muslim philosophers and intellectuals who have been exploring with different perspectives. Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra, while sharing on some of the principles and issues of science and intellect, especially rational perceptions, disagree on some of the basics and issues.
According to Aristotle, Ibn Sina believes in the theory of abstraction that the flow of knowledge, in particular rational perception, is gradually derived from the sense of the passage of imagination and ultimately the attainment of reason. Mulla Sadra, based on the principles of transcendental theosophy and the various degrees of being, asserts that reaching the levels of knowledge depends on the perfection of the self in many ways, and as a result, the rational perception is achieved from the level of self-perception to the level of imagination and from the level of imagination to the universe. They are the influences of the world of reason, and they interpret it as the level of reason. On the one hand, this statement criticizes previous perspectives and, on the other hand, has registered a new theory in this field in its own name. In this paper, we will examine and adapt the views of these two philosophers through a descriptive-analytical method.