Reviewing and Criticizing the Hume's Doubts of the Argument from Design's Major of a Syllogism

In contemporary times, the prevailing view among thinkers is that, the Hume's critiques of the argument from design has only undermined and discredited allegorical and deductive expositions on this argument. Hence, in this paper, we are going to study the Hume's challenges of the argument from design's major of a syllogism to find a suitable answer for them. Using a descriptive-analytical method, this paper seeks to answer the question of whether the argument from design capable of resisting Hume's doubts? And could there be any reasonable defense of this argument? The findings show that, most of these challenges do not have the right logic, but even though his alternate explanation of the tangible order, which is visible in the universe and approved by biology, is impossible based on the accident and chance, it is not impossible.