The ineffectiveness of lexical analyzes in terms of the history of the Qur'anic and hadith

The necessity of adopting a historical approach is one of the important principles in the analysis of historical terms in the field of Qur'anic and hadith texts. Damage to the lack of attention to the distinction between the terminology and non-terminology of a term is one of the most important injuries in the history of the subject for these topics. Usually, the mind of the researcher, to highlight the background, tries to help to narrow the meaning of the term without considering this distinction and by collecting any application of the word. Therefore, it should be viewed as the "non-adherence of the term in the form of a lexical word" as a principle. In this article, firstly, the fallacy of historical ancestry, as the mother of common misconceptions in the field of the analysis of religious texts, is examined and the terms: hadith, commentary, miracle, Quran, and a comprehensive hadith are analyzed. In the second part of the article, the problem of "changing the notion" as the most important factor for proving the mistakenness of the historical term of the terminology is explained, and also the ways of recognizing the notion governing the use of the term in terms of five cases: the study of function, Cognitive, making changes in the tone of the word, changing classification and vocabulary equivalence are examined.