Behavioral Logic of the Imams (PBUT) in Confrontation with Exaggerators

Throughout history, the issue of exaggeration has always existed not only among Muslims but also before Islam. But what is been under investigation is that at the time of exaggeration, how much interaction can be observed in the speech and behavior of the individual or those who are been exaggerated? And how was of the Imams’ (PBUT) interaction against exaggerators? This study identifies the behavioral logic and the Holy Imams’ (PBUT) interactions against claims of the exaggerators.
The result is that Ahl al-Bayt (PBUT) had no debate with any of exaggerators. Since they believed that rational purpose and conclusion are a requisite for every debate and dialogue. On the other hand, they expressed true beliefs against untrustworthy thoughts and beliefs. Obviously, they denounced and expressed their disgust of exaggerators’ beliefs, and if the rejected belief was precisely attributed to a individual or group of individuals from the exaggerators, those majesties would reject, reproach, and excommunicate them.