Analysis and critique of the point of viewof Mujtahid Shabestari in the field of science Jurisprudential principles and jurisprudent "independent reasoning"

Mr. Mohammad Mujtahid Shabestari Claims, in the memo "Why is the era of Jurisprudential principles and jurisprudent "independent reasoning" been over?", from the beginning of Islam to the pre-Renaissance period, the jurisprudents solved all the problems relying on a theological theory only by deducing from the Holy Qur'an and the tradition and jurisprudent "independent reasoning" on In those two sources, in all areas of religious or social, political and economic life of Muslim. This method continued after the Renaissance and emergence of new issues, But gradually, especially after the Islamic Revolution, there was a serious problem, because there are issues that have no connection or origin in the Book and the Tradition. As a result, the entire Juristic opinion of the jurisprudents in this regard was based only on rational issues and sciences of the day and they have no root in the Book and the Tradition. In fact, these science of the day illuminate the new issues, and no Jurisprudential principles and jurisprudent "independent reasoning". Therefore, it can be claimed that the era Jurisprudential principles and jurisprudent "independent reasoning" has come to an end. This article has been criticized by Mr. Mojtahed Shabestari in two directions: first, his points of view on the theory of the support of jurisprudent "independent reasoning" will be criticized, then to analyze his conclusion about ineffectiveness this theory, and revealing his fallacy and profound scientific mistakes, It is proved that the science of Jurisprudential principles with its progress and jurisprudent "independent reasoning" with their dynamism can answer all the new issue, and it will also be proved that the illusions that are subjected to rational methods and no dependent on the Book and the Tradition, Basically, it's not a matter of inferiority but the it's executive instruments of the first Judgments, or the type of government Judgments and options of governor that has its own methodology.