Absence of Influence Claims of the Debtors on the Rights of Lebanon and Egypt and Adaptation it to Internal Regulations

When the property situation of the debtor is getting worse, the debtor may deliberately make transactions that would be detriment his/her creditors and deduction of the public security debt. The creditors, in such case, due to the statute, can interfere in the Issued possessions by debtors. Because this possession, may impress the public security (debt public security) and it caused weakness of this public security. In some Arab countries, including Egypt and Lebanon, the legislators have predicted rules to protect creditors; that gives to creditors the opportunity litigation absence of influence claims of debtor's possessions. The result of the absence of influence claims of debtor's possession in the Egypt and Lebanon right is equal to absence of ability to refer to the contract in Iran law. An institution that has entered to Iran’s rights from other countries' right, but It is not predicted directly and as a criterion in the laws of our country, and only in limited cases, the legislator, has ordered to the absence of the ability to refer some possessions and transactions, explicitly or implicitly, for instance we can refer to the civil code of Article (218) and Article (4) of law in the manner of implementation of financial convictions. Absence of influence claims, though, have similarities with  the idiomatic absence of influence, but, it is different from it and has some conditions and special effects that the most important of its condition is the bad intention of debtors to transf er of property.