Explain the Two Recordings of the Hafez’s Divan:“Jame Iskandar” and “Div Mosalman Nashavad”

In these two bits of Hafez's Divan: “Khiale abekhezerbast’o jam Iskandar/Keyxosro Be jor’enooshi’e sultan Abolfavares shod” and “Esmea'zambekonadkarekhodey del khosh bash ke be talbisohiyal div mosalman/Soleymannashavad” Between the scholars about the recordings of "JameKeyxosroor Iskandar?" and "DivSoleymannashavad or Mosalman?" there have been various discussions.In the first instance, the "JameIskandar" is documentary on a manuscript (Khalkhali 827 AH) and all the other manuscripts have the "JameKeyxosro". But because Iskandar (Alexander), according to the evidence of fiction and poetry, had a special cup with surprising features that did not diminish its water and worldviews and opening the secret, recording the "JameIskandar" is based on the rule of "the most difficult recording is superior," in the scientific-critical correctionof the Divan Hafiz is more original than the "JameKeyxosro".In the second case also with the neglecting the record of the "Mosalmannashavad”, in more and prior of Hafez’s Divan manuscripts - in examining recordings of this kind, it should not be the sole criterion of choice and selection -according to another clause in the corrigendum of the texts, that is, "which one can be modified by another?" that recording is true and probably almost certainly some scribes do not record "Mosalmannashavad" to eliminate the rhyme in sonnets, observe the fit of the bit and coordination with components and its allusionelements it has turned into “Soleymannashavad”.