Comparative Comparison of the of Quality of Urban Public Spaces(Case Study of District 1 and 6 of Isfahan)

Abstract Urban spaces have long since been the cornerstone of social interaction of people. Although the quantitative and qualitative features of urban spaces have changed over time and due to different factors, citizens and other users of the city have always needed such spaces. In a general sense, urban is the interconnection between relationships and behaviors.The aim of this study is comparative study of the desirability of quality urban spaces in areas 1 and 6 of Isfahan. The quantitative research method is a descriptive-analytic and statistical population of all citizens over the age of 15 years in two regions in the year 96. The total number of population according to the Cochran formula was estimated 375 samples,The results of the research were analyzed using SPSS software, T-test and inferential tests (Pearson & Spearman, etc.). The results of the assumptions test showed that the quality of urban space in the region is not 1 and 6, and with Considering the average of two regions, it can be said that the quality of urban space in area 1 is more than area 6. The quality of urban space in the neighborhoods was, respectively, Beid Abadi neighborhood with average 72.29, Ali Gholi Agha with an average of 65.88 from Zone 1 and Shiraz gate with an average of 63.72 and Mardavige with an average of 61.12 from Zone 6. Urban space security is equal in males and females, and the higher the level of education, the less satisfied urban furniture satisfaction