The legitimate expectations of the investor in contrast to the essential ‎security interests of the host state and its analysis as a political risk

The governments is trying to reconcile between the two Targets to encourage and ‎support foreign investment on the one side and protect of their essential interests on the ‎other hand,Sometimes in conflict with each other, Manage have taken of inserting the ‎condition of exception to the fundamental interests of the host state, international ‎investment agreements which allows governments to invocate essential security ‎interests whenever they wish to restrict or allocate the provisions of the treaty.‎ In contrast, investment contracts listed in stablization clause in order to reduce the ‎risk of legislative,Non-discrimination by granting national treatment and most favored ‎nations behavior,As The most important government's commitment in the face of ‎foreign investment, Along with some other supporting concepts such as the obligation to ‎provide fair and equitable treatment in relation to foreign investment is ‎raised.Supporting these expectations in many cases in conflict and friction with the ‎fundamental interests are preserved.‎ thus, In this article, in addition to analyse the fundamental interests clause in contrast ‎to the standards of investor protection In the practice of international investment ‎agreements, Some arbitral awards issued are also examined.‎