The present study investigates the two Qasidas "the Stupid Fig" by Elia Abu Madi and "the Two Pines" by Mohammad Javad Mohabbat to reach a common semantic structure between the two. The main reasons for the comparison between the two Qasidas are the message that two refer to the same meanings, and the reader goes beyond the referral of the work to the real world because two Qasidas give such a description that return of the image leads to a symbolic analysis associated with the Riffaterre’s reading.This research is based on a descriptive-analytical method to explain the generative grammar, the application of verbs, and other mechanisms that allow the process of communication between the author and the reader. Riffaterre’s Semantic Theory is also adapted to two Qasidas. This method seems more suitable because it is the one for reading poetry that violates conventional syntax and semantics.The research results show that the contradiction between the level of imitation and the syntactic deviations in two Qasidas leads the reader to the discovery of similar semantic accumulation between them such as selflessness, cruelty, destruction, and the hard conditions of the community that make it possible to re-create the text.In contrast to the structural matrix, the reader understands the two lines of commitment to friendship and forgiveness as inspirational codes in his mind, and specifies that the unity of the two Qasidas lies in the common hypnogram, which is that "the basis of the life of friendship and honesty is far of self-esteem".
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.