Searching the Condition of Authenticity of Medical Expertism in Prooving of Members Benefit Compensation, from Shiah Jurisprudence Point of View

Specialization in the Science and Thinking about its impact on Ijtihad making clear the analyzing of the position and impact of the expert’s opinion on religious jurisprudence. Specialist doctors are the experts that the effectiveness of their expert's theory is clear and striking in different parts and multiple jurisprudential issues. Nowadays, the possibility of discovering the truth with the medical knowledge and its new and accurate tests, specially Paying attention to the ever increasing Specialization of this knowledge making extensive and comprehensive the scope of discussion about the functions of the medical expert theory in jurisprudence and law. In the present article, this effect is analyzing the proving of member’s benefit Compensation and meantime explaining the examples of medical expert in proof of Compensations of dementia, sight, hearing, smell, taste senses and principled views analyzing bet on credit of expert. Two point of view about bet on credit of jurisprudence expert; view point of Expert testimony, bet on justice and Plurality in it and view point of efficiency of acquisition of trust confidence and Rational assurance; in first point of view, in proving of member’s benefit Compensation has a jurisprudential reputation. This article selected the second view base on researching speech fans of two point of view deals with the analytical and ijtihad methods, and with explaining of the significant difference in testimony and expert theory, and reality of it base on rational fixed method, Introducing the acquisition of confidence and negating the possibility of mistake as the criterion of this method.