Extradition of offenders to the legal system of Iran, Turkey and international law

Although successful execution of extradition offenders guarantees judicial justice, this process requires international judicial cooperation. But in practice, issues and relations between countries are at stake. Thus, in the last two centuries, many countries have adopted many international conventions and conventions (such as the Palermo Convention) while enacting domestic laws. In 1939, Iran ratified many international laws by adopting the law on extradition of offenders. The present study deals with the comparative study of the principles and procedures of dealing with, extradition and formalities in Iran, Turkey and international law.

The purpose of this study is an applied descriptive-analytic one using existing internal and external sources, documents and laws.Findings and

The results show that the actions of the Iranian and Turkish governments in the field of extradition will be beneficial when adhering to domestic and international law, without unjustified excuses and realizing political issues and cooperation. Show. Of course, contrary to Iranian law and international law, the Turkish penal system in the field of extradition has not enacted a specific law and has merely mentioned a few general principles in Article 9 of the Penal Code.