The Great Game and the Herat Question (1828 – 1838)

The Great Game of Russia and Britain, which began in the early nineteenth century, led to the confrontation of the two powers in Iran until the early twentieth century. The Russian-British rivalry in Iran intensified after the second round of Iran-Russia wars in the Caucasus, when the restoration of Iran’s historical rule over Herat was on the agenda of the Iranian government, resulting in the siege of Herat in 1837, an incident that caused British politicians to worry about Russia’s expansion in the western borders of India. The findings of this study indicate that the idea of ​​capturing Herat was partly influenced by Russians’ support to divert the Iranian government’s attention from the Caucasus. In addition, with the Herat crisis and Britain’s concern about the expansion of Russia’s influence on the borders of India, the creation of a buffer state became vital in the framework of India’s defense strategy. Under the circumstances that Russians were supporting the Iranian court during the siege of Herat, Palmerston’s regional and extra-regional aggressive policy, followed by Russians’ passive stance, led to the rapid deployment of force to the Persian Gulf and ended the campaign in Herat in favor of Britain. Afterwards, Britain stabilized its position in today’s Afghanistan. Contrary to other studies that mostly examine the issue of Herat in the framework of Iran’s relations with Britain, Russia, or the Emirate of Afghanistan, this article examines the issue of Herat’s siege in the context of the Great Game.