The results and influences of the principle of civil verdicts practice stoppage prevention

Verdict practice is the continuation of the trial process; therefore its unnecessary stoppage is both does not make sense and against the policy-maker will, and leads to nothing but indiscipline and chaos in the society. In this end, non-stoppage of verdict practice in Iran with some specific legal cases has been accepted as a principle. The domain of this principle, in terms of time span, is after the certainty of verdict and the announcement of the verdict until its full practice and the end of the practice process, and in terms of objective, includes the issued judicial verdicts by the judicial courts or any other resources with civic features.The agreements are not included in this domain except indispensable agreements such as demand supply and preliminary order. The effects can be seen on practicing parties, third parties, officials, agents and judges of verdict practice, which has been mentioned in various laws with penal practice guarantee and civic responsibility. High speed and effectiveness of verdict practice, respect to the rights of both parties, observing the view of the wining party, observing the interests and the rights of the losing party are among the advantages of this principle