Proof of the necessity of Besat based on the inherent motion and critique of the proofs of the Imamieh theologians

According to the definition of the science of theology, proving the necessity for a speaker is necessary. Meanwhile, the Imamite theologians are no exception to this rule. The proof of this hypothesis, which is the first hypothesis of this paper, reduces the epistemological value of their argument from the rational (a priori) to the experimental (post) rational level. After criticizing these arguments, it was necessary, with an analytical review, to prove the momentous move in the views of Mulla Sadra and the introduction of his principles, with the hypothesis that using the principles of Mulla Sadra, one could propose an antecedent for the necessity of being. To achieve this conclusion, the pursuit of the second hypothesis follows