Critical Examination of the Fundamentals of Jurisprudence on the Uncertainty of the Mahreh Imamieh Jurisprudence

Marriage in Islam as a divine covenant and woman as a pillar of this holy place has a fortune. The main throne was to consolidate love in the family and support for the woman. From the viewpoint of the jurisprudents of the Imams and Sunnis, the principle of Mahri has no doubt that the main difference is in its quantity, with the vast majority of Shi'a jurisprudents having considered the abnormal feast. The mahria, which at first showed the male-female honesty, has become a problem for the family. Negative consequences of an abnormal mahria on the life of a person, family and society are not in doubt. Now, the question arises whether, according to the jurisprudential justification, the voidness of the abnormal feast can be proved? Thought on the basis of the jurisprudence of the Mahrei shows that the abnormal mahriyah is inappropriate and inappropriate for some reason, and some of its foundations are not compatible with the rules of jurisprudence. Therefore, it seems that the holy shrine is not indifferent to the amount of Mahri, and it considers some restrictions. The present study deals with documentary-librarianship methodology and descriptive-analytical approach as an arbitrator.