Critical Discourse Analysis of Risk Reporting by Bank's Board using a Linguistic Approach

This paper identifies the critical discourses in the context of financial reporting and awareness of users. In First, Fairclough explains the linguistic position to the concrete text, then identifies the discourses on which the text relies, and explains how they depend on macro social theories. Eghtesad Novin Bank in 1395, was selected through targeted sampling. Risk phrases were identified from the target text, which was classified into two positive and negative risk terms. At the level of the interpretation, the author discourse of prosperity and hope, and the discourse of the collapse is a discourse of stagnation and fear. The presence of women in the board, the independence of the board and the duality of duties, are among the issues that influence the way discourse is produced. In the text, the shell of hope and prosperity has covered all the stagnation and downhill. The ruling space in the whole report refers to the insistence on the power of managers and the static nature. Reflection in these threads convinces the reader that what has finally shown its domination and dominance is not the boom of discourse, but it is the discourse of recession, or collapsing.