A Comparative Study of Two Poems “Eagle” of Omar Abi Risha and the “Eagle” of Parviz Natel Khanlori Based on the Maurice Grammont Theory

Repetition of phonetic parts results in phonemic balance in literary works. It has a significant role in carrying the meaning and content in the poet's mind. Maurice Grammont believes that each phoneme may implicate the different meanings. The poet and writer also value this small member of the language in the creation of music and meaning, and make good use of it to induce the content of his speech. The following article seeks to examine the two poems of Al-Nasr by Abu Rish and “Eagle” by Khanlari, based on the American School of Comparative Studies, in a descriptive-analytical manner and based on the theory of Maurice Grammont. The writer knows well the value of this small part of language to create rhythm and meaning and based on this the reader guesses the secrets of words. This is an analytic descriptive study that compares the two poems “the eagle” of Abi Risha and Khanlori based on the American school and the Maurice Grammont theory. These aforementioned poems have many similarities in meanings and concepts; but according to Grammon's theory, there are subtle similarities and differences that are important. The similarities in the use of consonants and vowels are on the same level; that is, both poets, respectively, have assigned the highest frequency to the brilliant and cohesive echo and the lowest frequency to the dark and halfharmonic echo; but the differences are in how these phonemes are used to convey the content of the word. Abu Rish-e-Raja spoke loudly and unabashedly about his anger and rage through the shining Wak, and he turned the nation against the oppressors and illuminated the light of hope in their hearts; However, by choosing the role of narrator for himself, Khanlari uses the brilliant vowel only to describe the authority, glory and feelings of the eagle and he avoids revelation by using the dark vowel; therefore, there is a special coherence and harmony between the music and the thought of both poems.