he relation of two Principles of Correctness and Corruption to the article 10 of Civil Code and The Principle of Contracts’ Freedom1

Jurisprudential texts have frequently referred the two principles of correctness and corruption in transactions without clarifying the scope and application of these two principles in a disciplined and lucid manner. This ambiguity has led to confusion of the framework and functions of Articles 10 and 223 Civil Code in legal texts. The principle of correctness in topical misgivings could be prioritized to the principle of corruption but one cab bot resort to the principle
of correctness to exclude the principle of corruption. As the transactions in ruling doubts are custom-oriented, for excluding the corruption principle, one can investigate the opposing reasons to the general and absolute indications of transactions, for instance, the principle of fulfilling the contracts is resortable and the correctness of the transaction is proved through the afore-mentioned verbs reasons. Clearly, given the legitimacy and legality of a contract is proven, it is binding with reference to the article 10 of civil code. Such legitimacy is proven if the reasons are investigated and no opposing reasons are proven referring to a specific, general, or absolute reason, albeit it rests on intellectual’s conduct and the peoples’ intention to legitimize it is not sufficient. The present paper is to sate, analyze, and criticize legal and jurisprudential texts to determine the scope of these two principles of correctness and corruption. Consequently, the exact avenues of the articles 10 and 223 of civil code are determined.