Civil Liability Arising Out of Leaving the Delinquent Acts among the Armed Forces Personnel

The purpose of this article is to explain the responsibility of employees with the attitude of reducing the costs of leaving their duties. The research is done in terms of collecting information in a documentary way and through books, articles, existing laws and regulations and statements of the Supreme Leader and the information is analyzed in a descriptive-analytical manner. The research findings show In addition to the harmful act of the employees of the Armed Forces, sometimes the omission of the act also causes harm to the persons, and therefore in the harm caused by the omission of the harmful act of the employees, if the omission of the act directly and through fault causes harm to the persons, the employees themselves. Reimbursement of damages to individuals will be required, so if they are not at fault, the relevant organization will be liable for damages, but if his indirect action causes damage, because the basis of liability in this case is the rule of discipline and condition. It is the fault of this rule that if they are not at fault, no responsibility will be placed on those employees. The results show that the authors of the Armed Forces Penal Code are responsible for the owners of objects, including weapons and ammunition and vehicles, military uniforms, documents and event records. ... in Articles 80 to 92 based on intention and fault of the building They have emphasized the issue of punishment and only in Article 85 of the law it is mentioned that it is necessary to compensate. Given the sensitivity of the actions of these employees, it is necessary to enact and enforce laws in this regard, which require them to pay compensation. Employee civil liability is based on the theory of fault, and the criterion for fault is the judgment of the conventional behavior of the professional armed forces officer.