The Penology of Tash'hir and scandal disclosure for convicted Judges
In recent years, the debate of publishing and reporting the punishments of economic offenders in the media has been challenged. This matter enhanced its importance about judges and prosecutors for the necessity of dealing with corruption at the level of sovereignty and, at the same time, the importance of maintaining the place of judgment. For them, the release their images and names of the convicts was also sensitive. From scientist's perspective, each of the punishments contains disadvantages and benefits and seems neglecting the purposes of scandal's pathology and Tash'hir's that imposing for corrupt judges leads to overcoming incommodities on their benefits. So the important question is that what should be similar performance of scandal and Tash'hir for judges as same as other economic offenders or not? This article seeks to review of the country's laws regarding the Tash'hir and recent approaches of the judicial authorities that according to the current rules proves the public disclosure of judges may be more vulnerable than running it.
Tash'hir , Judge , Punishment , Penology , Public Disclosure , Fair Trial
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.