Surveying the Implication of the Narration “Truly, the Word Makes Something Lawful or Unlawful” in Relation to the Validity of the Word in the Necessity of the Contract

There are different views in discussing the necessity or the lack of necessity of the transactions without contraction. One of the reasons referred to by those who believe in the lack of necessity of the transactions without contraction is the famous narration “truly, the word makes something lawful or unlawful”. There are disagreements among jurists as to whether the “word” has been used in its superficial meaning or it has a metaphoric meaning. There are various possibilities according to the reasons in this regard by analyzing of which it turned out that none of them are acceptable; rather, by the “word” it is probably meant the corresponding meaning: that is, a conversation carried out between the dealer and the customer, which has the capability of being both the rules of vindication and sanctity without being involved in the problems of other possibilities and it will not lead to any conflict with the validity of the transaction without contraction.