International responsibility of states for changes in international borders is considered an important issue in international law. Tensions and movements by real or legal groups across international borders can pave the way for divergent approaches between neighboring political entities. The present study uses a descriptive-analytical method to examine the issue of international responsibility of governments, treaties and agreements on border regulation between Iran and Pakistan and the responsibility of these two countries in securing their borders and the international responsibility of the Pakistani government against terrorist groups located in the southeastern international border of the country. The findings show that if proven support or negligence in the fight and prevention of the emergence of terrorist groups on the international borders of countries that cause damage and hurt to the neighboring country, the injured countries may, in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 687, as well as in accordance with paragraphs 2a and 2c of Article 8 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, take the necessary measures to claim damages from the country. The results show that the activities of terrorist groups in the southeastern borders of Iran and the creation of hostages and clashes with border guards and the martyrdom of those who flee to Pakistan after any activity and due to lack of prosecution, impunity and lack of the expulsion and extradition of members of existing groups by Pakistan was considered an international violation that would give the country international responsibility in international courts to the Islamic Republic of Iran.
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.