Comparative Study of the Position and Principles of the Performance of Quasi-Judicial Authorities in Acquisition of Lands in British and Iranian Law.

compulsory acquisition ofland byexecutive bodies for public interest is permitted bypayment of compensation and observance of the lawIn order to do solaw must giveopportunity to object to theprocess ofacquisition and maintain the right to compensation toindividuals whoseproperty rights are affected by related actions.Due tocharacteristics of speed, low cost, and expertise in examination,quasi-judicial authorities havecreated a suitable solution in this fieldIn this article with an analytical-comparative approach inIranian andBritish law we seek to answer questions what is theposition of quasi-judicial authorities in the acquisition process?And by what principles are therights of owners and persons affected by ownership protected inthese authorities?In Britishbefore approving the order of compulsory acquisition by Minister related to acquisitionhe proceeds toexamine objections through two way;written representations, public local inquiry.LandTribunal determines compensation under standard procedure;simplified procedure;special procedure;written representations procedure.In both ways,the right holders are informed about provisions of the administrative authority's decision,the principles of natural justicehearing of the statements and reasons ofparties,the documented and reasoned decisions,and theability to appeal is recognized.in Iranian law, thecorresponding rules on the objection to theprocess of acquisition are not provided for in the quasi-judicial authority, and at thesame time there are shortcomings indetermination of compensation expert board.Therefore, suggestions have been made to amend thelaws