Fiqh al-Hadith Fi Zlah al- Sahifeh al- Sajjadieh in Comparison with the Objective Hermeneutic Model

Hermeneutics as a hub for understanding texts, existence, knowledge, etc. has two tendencies, relativist and objectivist. Objectivists, unlike relativists, believe in the possibility of presenting an objective interpretation and the intent of the creator of the work, although this presentation in the real world is angled with the mindset of the author and therefore have tried to establish principles, methods and rules for hermeneutics so that texts can be measured. “Fi Zlah al- Sahifeh al-Sajjadieh” is one of the works of Mughniyeh, a contemporary writer in the description of Sahifeh al- Sajjadieh, which has been written with the author's special approaches. This study using descriptive-analytical method and library resources has tried to analyze the method and principles of Mughniyeh hadith jurisprudence in "Fi Zlah al-Sahifeh al- Sajjadieh" with some of the principles and criteria presented by Betty and Harsh, two objective hermeneuticists. The findings of this article indicate that Mughniyeh in his combinatorial and selective Interpretation of Sahifeh Sajjadieh with a lexical, philosophical and social approach in the field of clarifying the relationship between the Qur'an and other narrations with Sahifeh prayer, proximity of religions, explaining the relationship of Sahifeh prayer with current problems of societies Human has provided. Although there are some shortcomings in this, but he has implemented the principles of consistency of meaning, Actuality of understanding and coordination of Betty well, but there are shortcomings in observing the principle of Autonomy. His description has also been successful in measuring the criteria of legitimacy, Correspondence, Generic appropriateness and Coherence.