Examples of the Peremptory Norms of International Human Rights in the Light of the Citizenship Rights System of the Islamic Republic of Iran

In order to globalize and diminish the shadow of national sovereignty of states over human rights, all human beings (regardless of which state they are citizens of) are consideredmembers of the international community and, as a result, enjoy different rights. In this regard, in order to design and present a set of legal standards and norms to ensure more and better human rights, the concept of fundamental human rights in the literature of international law in particular and international human rights, has emerged.

In this analytical-descriptive study, the concept of peremptory norms in international law and its effects will be discussed first. After accurately identifying this variable, we will introduce examples of peremptory norms in the field of international human rights. In the next step, the framework of citizenship rights in the Iranian legal system and examples of these rights will be identified as another variable of this research.Ethical Considerations:In order to organize this research, while observing the authenticity of the texts, honesty and fidelity have been observed.

By accepting and ratifying the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Iranian government has incorporated the concept of fundamental human rights, which is one of the examples of the peremptory norms in international law, into its domestic legal system. In the present study, it is observed that the distinction between the concept of human rights and citizenship rights within the framework of domestic law will affect Iran's international obligations in relation to fundamental human rights.

On the one hand, the classification of international human rights norms and their division into two categories of fundamental and non-fundamental rights, and on the other hand, the lack of attention of the Iranian domestic legal system to this issue in some cases can cause international Responsibility for state in the field of International law and relations. As a result, the need to amend domestic laws and regulations in relation to fundamental human rights seems inevitable.