Investigating the Relationship between Taqas Rule (Retaliation) and the System Disruption Prohibition Rule

One of the basic and fundamental rules of jurisprudence is the system disruption prohibition rule that is, the obligation to maintain the political system. In jurisprudential texts, there are cases in which jurists deny the existence of something due to disorder of the system or, on the contrary, consider it necessary in order to maintain the system. On the other hand, according to jurisprudential principles, one of the ways to receive financial rights is Taqas rule or retaliation. This institution was not recognized by the legislature after the revolution, while judicial precedent following jurisprudence in many cases has considered retaliation as a justifiable factor. The reason for the negligence of the legislator is that some jurists believe this institution as a cause of chaos; but by reviewing the conditions of retaliation, we will see that the territory of this institution is not vast and unruly, and depends on the realization of conditions that are created according to public order. Therefore, the prohibition of committing a crime in retaliation is a condition and hence, inflicting damage with retaliation is not accepted. In this research, in a descriptive-analytical method, while emphasizing the importance of maintaining the political system and preventing its disruption, it is stated that according to the conditions stated in the Sharia, there is no conflict between these two rules.