Honor in murder stemming from the abandonment of the verb holder

There is a great deal of difference between jurists and jurists regarding the crime of manslaughter. The source of this disagreement is whether or not abandonment can be a material element of the crime. Some have answered that question with the notion that abandonment is a non-existent and cannot be an existential thing, and others have found the offense to be non-legal. Writing on the subject of criminal jurisprudence and the subject of murder, the author believes that abandoning the act in terms of other circumstances can not only cause murder but can, as the case may be, fall under Article 2 of the Islamic Penal Code and deliberate murder. Although the legislator has referred to the act of the killer in the three articles of Article 3, the word here does not mean the act described in Article 2 of the Islamic Penal Code. Where one accepts protection or the care of another, consequently accepting this obligation causes death, thereby obliging him to dispose of the danger. In other words, work in Article 6 BC is used in the sense of behavior, just as custom refers to work in the sense of behavior. On the other hand, the principle is that the legislator does not use synonyms. That is, the legislator is not permitted to use the word verb in Article 6 BC and in the context of that law, instead of the verb.