A Critique and Survey of the View of Religion as Not Being Revealed

One of the debates in theology, more than any other subject in the modern period, is the discussion of different readings of religion, or as Shabestari puts it, the humanistic reading of religion. The history of such debates in the Arab world goes back to Nasr Hamed Abu Zayd and then to Mr. Soroush and Mr. Shabestari in our country. The main problem of the article is to study Shabestari and his view of religion as not being revealed. His main claim is that God did not reveal any religion, because if God had revealed a religion, it should have been specified in the Qur'an, but there is no such explanation in It. In this article, after stating Shabestari's principles, we have tried to formulate his claims in a logical way and clarify the validity of his arguments and show that Shabestari's interpretation of religion is self-contradictory and his words needs to agree with the holy Quaran in any case as the word of God.