Problems of religious pluralism with a consequentialist approach

Religious pluralism is a good alternative to the two approaches of religious exclusivism and inclusiveness. The greater conformity of religious pluralism to the requirements of the New World has made it more attractive. But this approach is unacceptable in terms of principles, principles and especially its results. Among the important reasons for not accepting religious pluralism, in terms of its results, the following can be mentioned: 1. It ignores the realities of different religions; 2. Religious pluralism ignores important differences within religious traditions; 3. Iqbal leads to the futility of the question of religious legitimacy and human endeavor to save; 4. The acceptance of religious pluralism leads to epistemological relativism and the meaninglessness of religious truthseeking; 5. Attachment to religious pluralism makes the meaning of revelation meaningless and abolishes the philosophy of prophecy; 6. Belief in this approach leads to the futility of the difference between imitative and research religiosity; 7. The devaluation of religiosity and religious beliefs is one of the results of welcoming religious pluralism; 8. Accepting it also violates the divine attributes and insults the divine dignity of God; 9. Success in it leads to the growth of religious immorality, and 10. Therefore, it destroys the religious identity of believers. Considering the unacceptable problems of religious pluralism, and the ineffectiveness of the two previous approaches, the proposal of this research is to reflect on the skeptical approach to the issue of legitimacy and salvation; This means that there are two gifts of legitimacy and salvation to varying degrees of longitudinal skepticism and hierarchy in all religions; However, the ultimate salvation depends on the efforts of the believers themselves.