An analysis of disnarration and its semiotic challenges in Shazde Ehtejab

Narrative is an action-oriented structure defined on the basis of a linear system based on material imperfection. The main purpose of such a narrative is to show the acquisition of value based on the movement of agents. However, with the advent of the post-Greimas period in the Paris school, we come to a new aspect of the narrative in which events are not in their original place and therefore cause anxiety, anomaly and mental confusion of agents and readers. It is in this context that the narrative overlaps and, by shifting the elements of action, time and place, the narrative leaves its strong structures. Accordingly, a new era of narrative begins, which we call the post-action and post-deterministic period: these shifts and narrative interactions occur in the heart of the narrative cause disnarrative. Disnarrative leads to encountering a kind of intervention and movement of elements or a kind of surprise in which the narrative is no longer a function of phases and process stages based on the classical pattern. The main question we face is how disnarrative disrupts the narrative process and changes it from a fixed and coded state to an indefinite and turbulent state? According to the post-action approach, the main issue of the article is to see how disnarrative changes the conditions of meaning production. The main purpose of this paper is to study the process of disnarrative with emphasis on elements such as anti-action, anachrony, displacement and dissemantic by focusing on the story of “Shazdeh Ehtejab”.