Comparison of "Give and Take" in classic and contemporary sonnets

Give and take, as one of the most common types of debate, explains the dialogue between two people with verses that begin with the verb "said" and its derivatives. Such debates are accompanied by boasting, self-satisfaction, blaming the opponent and convincing the opponent, and usually lead to the victory of one of the parties to the debate. Contemporary poets have used the question and answer method in their romantic and social poems, and more than pride and competition, they have talked and interacted and created a multi-voiced and conversational atmosphere. The present study uses a descriptive-analytical method to answer the questions that what are the differences between questions and answers in traditional and contemporary sonnets and what are the factors that cause these differences ?, argues that contemporary poetry because The changes resulting from the political and social conditions, and as a result of the change in the views and ideologies of the poets, move towards dialogue, and the purpose of the question and answer in contemporary sonnet is to clarify the subject and reach a common ground, not destruction and victory. On the other hand, it usually ends without judgment and the conclusion is left to the reader.