"Definite the task" in examining the theory of the right of obedience

When there is doubt in the obligation and there is no reason, it is the time to implement the practical principle. What is the verdict of basic rule in case of doubt in the obligation? There is disagreement among fundamentalists. The famous fundamentalists believe in the implementation of the innocence by virtue of reason and by citation of the rule of ugly rule of unspoken punishment.Contrary to the popular opinion some people, by rejecting the popular view, considered the rule of reason as a necessity of caution. Martyr Sadr (RA) called this theory the right of obedience and he believes that as long as the release is not from the legislator, whoever opposes the suspicious duty, deserves the punishment.From these two professions, we have accepted the theory of obedience. But in accepting this theory, we have a nominal understanding and a fundamental disagreement with Martyr Sadr. Because Martyr Sadr considered the issue of the right of obedience as an obligatory task, but we considered the issue of the right of obedience as a duty in the real world according to the practical rational rule.While reviewing criticizing and rejecting the two mentional professions, we have explained and presented arguments and defended our point of view and we have named it finalized of duty or new method.I invite you to read this article to get more accustomed with the new method.