The position of the legal guardian in explaining the foreign policy strategies of the Islamic Republic of Iran

The purpose of the current research is to investigate the position of the legal guardian in explaining the foreign policy macro strategies of J.A. It is Iran. What is important is that the position of the legal guardian in the field of foreign policy is based on the constitution or beyond it? The hypothesis of the article is: the institution of religious authority and the position of leadership is in charge of explaining and determining macro policies in the field of foreign policy, and these duties are based on the principles of the constitution because of the "role" of this institution. The findings of the research show that other institutions, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, have an executive role. Due to the fact that the determining aspects, clarification and macro-viewing are within the authority of the jurist and this position is also stated in the constitution, institutions such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are the implementers of policies that are even by the leadership, parliament, government The executive and other decision-making institutions in the field of foreign policy are also monitored. In other words, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is not a decision-maker and is the executor of decisions based on the Constitution. From this point of view, each of the mentioned institutions has its own place and position and it is impossible to equate the implementation and explanation of foreign policy macro strategies. The method of the descriptive-analytical article and the theoretical framework is James Rosena's continuity theory.