Critical Analysis of the Discourse of Privatization of Education and Upbringing in the Discourses of Ideologicalization and Construction

The aim of the present article is the critical analysis of the discourse of privatization of education in discourses after the Islamic Revolution with emphasis on the discourse of ideological and constructive. For this purpose, some direct statements and some governmental and educational texts and approvals in the two mentioned periods have been studied and criticized by Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis method. As a result from the analysis and interpretation of the texts, these discourses, are somewhat different in terms the privatization of education, political and value positions. Lack of budget, maintaining relations of hierarchical order, centralism, ambiguity and contradiction in opinion and practice, internal and external unrest, limited internal and external interactions, conservatism, dominance and superiority of intellectual and value positions of the upper echelons of the system and as the most important factor and obstacle compared to other cases, including the most significant internal constraints and external barriers in providing the requirements for educational privatization, especially at the qualitative level show the inconsistency of the goals and programs proposed with the real relations and goals of the two discourse.