Criminal procedural in authoritarian model of penal policy With emphasis on the accused rights in the preliminary investigation stage

Today, in some countries, in order to deal decisively with certain crimes (organized crime, terrorism, Drugs related crimes, etc.) and based on the interests arising from political ideologies in criminal proceedings, the accused rights in the preliminary investigation stage with restrictions So that in them we see a kind of differential criminal policy with the dominance of pervasive authoritarianism. The present article, using a descriptive-analytical method and the use of library resources while analyzing the formal regulations of Iran and other countries, seeks to answer the fundamental question of what approach the authoritarian model of penal policy under the influence of criminal policymakers to limit countries Has the accused rights been transferred to the preliminary investigation stage? It seems that today the security approach, while affecting the principles of predicting the rights of the accused, as well as the various rules and principles related to them, especially in the preliminary investigation stage, has significant effects that sometimes prevail in the democratic model of criminal policy. Exceptions to some of the rights of the accused at this stage take on a legislative effect. Legislators, therefore, favor a security-oriented approach while maintaining their political structure, but accepting a kind of discriminatory criminal policy in formal regulations and the manner in which the rules of criminal procedure are implemented.