Feasibility study of revising gender inequality, conditions and quality of adultery

The principle of equality of persons before the law is accepted in accordance with Article 14 of Article 3 of the Constitution. However, the Islamic Penal Code of 1992, in accordance with Imami jurisprudence, has considered gender to be involved in the implementation of some punishments, including limits. In the punishment of adultery, many differences are observed in the circumstances and also the quality of the execution of adultery.Given that the effect of gender on the punishment of individuals is contrary to the principle of. Considering these views, it becomes clear that some of these examples are the place of disagreement of the jurists and The principle of equality of persons before the law is accepted in accordance with Article 14 of Article 3 of the Constitution. However, the Islamic Penal Code of 1992, in accordance with Imami jurisprudence, has considered gender to be involved in the implementation of some punishments, including limits. In the punishment of adultery, many differences are observed in the circumstances and also the quality of theConsidering these views, it becomes clear that gender inequality has been positive and in accordance with the interests of both parties only in some cases, and in other cases, which include: reluctance to commit adultery against a man, proof of the death sentence for adultery with a spouse Motherhood and inequality in the definition provided in Ehsan are not in their interests.