Supervision of the complaints Board (law on tenders) on administrative contracts, pathology of structure and competence

Administrative contracts are one of the main sources of corruption in public affairs. Due to the financing of administrative contracts from the public budget and the high amount of these contracts, administrative authorities are influenced by personal interests in the relevant administrative decision. Considering the increase of efficiency and productivity of administrative organizations and the necessity of protecting and guaranteeing the rights of citizens against the abuse of public officials, supervision of administrative contracts is mandatory and unavoidable. In this regard, various supervisory authorities exercise supervision over administrative contracts. One of them is the Complaints Board (law on tenders). Now, what are the characteristics of administrative contracts that need to be monitored? To what extent can the Complaints Board, as a dedicated over sight body over see and ministrative contracts? And where are the challenges facing her? These questions are discussed in this article. Findings in the article show that the monitoring of this Board, in addition to its strengths, also has disadvantages, which we will review and make a suggestion.