The role of the judicial review of the International Court of Justice and its conflict with Article 59 of the Statute

the "judicial procedure" in the world's major legal systems has a different significance and is also considered as a source of law in the international system. The main question of the present research is that the judicial procedure of the International Court of Justice conflicts with Article 59 of the Statute? The main purpose of this study is to investigate the conflict of judicial procedure of the International Court of Justice with Article 59 of the Statute. It can be concluded that Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice refers to "international judicial decisions" and considers these decisions to be an underlying factor for the observance of international legal rules. When the United Nations member states decided to establish a permanent court after the founding of a community of nations, it should be determined that the court should invoke the rules for settling disputes. As a result, the Jurist's Advisory Committee set out detailed articles 38 of the Statute after detailed discussions, according to which three sources of contract, custom, and general principles of law were the main sources of direct and judicial decisions and doctrines as subsidiaries in the adoption of legal rules. The article does not state the source, these are merely considered as cases in which the court will enforce it. But what is certain is that the Tribunal makes a direct reference to the original sources, so the use of the term "source" seems to be correct. The research method is descriptive-analytical.