The Inclusion of Trespass in the Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights Based on the Boundaries of Intellectual Property and the Scope of Its Ownership

The proprietary approach to intellectual property rights is an evolving concept that seeks to apply traditional property law principles to intellectual property. A critical aspect of this approach is defining the boundaries of intellectual property and the scope of ownership. In traditional property law, violations of ownership boundaries are addressed through the doctrine of trespass, whereas in intellectual property law, such violations are termed infringements. This article examines whether the doctrine of trespass can apply to intellectual property infringements, considering the boundaries of intellectual property, the scope of ownership, and the duality of the rights to exclude and to use. It aims to determine whether these two doctrines are absolutely or relatively compatible, enabling the application of trespass rules to intellectual property infringements, particularly in cases of legal gaps or ambiguities. Using a descriptive-analytical method and library-based research, this study clarifies the abstract boundaries of intellectual property and the duality of the rights to exclude and to use. From a proprietary perspective, intellectual property rights, within the objective boundaries of intellectual property and where the rights to exclude and to use are unified, are deemed property rights. In such cases, infringement may align with the doctrine of trespass in traditional property law, allowing the application of trespass rules.