Semantics of the antichrist in the mission of ground-setting media

Apocalypse is an era in which streams of evil reaches its peak. According to narrative sources, the subject of the Antichrist is about a hypocrite and a mysterious. Mission of ground-setting media in the face of this depends on the picture to be drawn from these evil moves. An individualistic approach to mission of media is just warning about an apostolic dangerous person passively which does not get involved with the Antichrist "today, but expect the events of "Tomorrow". The movement approach to the issue of antichrist demands a mission of media which is not jut facing Dajjal but also looks at phenomenon called Dajjalism which is more organized and systematic in pursuing evil goals. In this way, the mission of media should not be one of passive warning about tomorrow but an active involvement with today. Of course, an approach to consider the traditions as fake also leads to a silent and passive mission in media. it looks as if looking at the issue as a phenomenon puts more responsibility on the shoulders of media which requires more elaboration. At least there are two groups in Dajjalism hegemony that the mission of media is not dealing with them in the same manner: 1) the group of leaders of Dajjalism (who deceive) and 2) The group of the Dajjalism followers and those who fall into deception. This mission can be classified in facing the leaders of Dajjalism as Jihad-like policy and negative (two approaches: criticizing and challenging their ideas and (b) disclosure of the roles and plots). But towards the deluded followers of Dajjalism phenomenon, the policy should be guide-like and positive (two approaches again: defining the principles and knowledge, and (b) showing the functions of Mahdism doctrine). Finally, an efficient and strong media can set the scene for the final government of the Imam (AS) with raising knowledge and awareness and awakening the world to this issue.