فصلنامه پژوهش های راهبردی سیاست
پیاپی 13 (تابستان 1394)

Election is among the criteria for distinguishing democratic system from other systems and the important parameters to evaluating and performance of these systems. Therefore the elections held in many different ways، including in terms of implementation quality، enforcer agencies، executives، supervisors، and quality of monitor and enforce، always of interest lawmakers، law enforcers and the citizens. Many factors play a role in the election that the roles and importance of each element depend to nature of the electoral system. In the electoral system of the Islamic Republic of Iran، the mechanisms of administrating of elections، is embedded on the basis of monitoring and enforcement، that each of which has been undertaken by different institutions. Continuous changes in the electoral laws and issues related to the legal election commission In the legal sphere of country''s show that despite numerous elections And continuous changes in election laws and gain useful experience in this field isn’t yet rightly specified desirable mechanism and pattern for election And hence the need to review the structure and procedures of the election is essential. This paper introduces a model for administrating election turning to Pathology of run elections in Iran. This study addressed the Election Commission and the role of the Election Administration from interior ministry to Commission In the context of the existing legal system، refers an alternative model of Iran''s elections administrator.

In this research، the contents of the Campaign teasers of the candidates of the 10th presidential election were reviewed and analyzed. For achieving this goal، the Practical Discourse Analysis Method (PDAM) was used. Research statistical society included all the eighth teasers broadcasted from Channel one of the national TV and the analysis index was also the main performers of candidates in their campaign teasers. The results had shown that candidates focused on specific issues in their teasers: Ahmadi Nejad on «justice basis” and “Service”، Mousavi on “incapability of Ahmadi Nejad “and “efficiency and political and cultural equality of himself”، Karoubi on “tendency to intelligence” and “inefficiency of the management system” and on Rezaie on “principals ability and programming “and “disability of Ahmadinejad government».

This study has investigated the effects of social factors on tendency towards democracy. Data for this analysis were collected from a sample of 643 citizens of Tehran aged 20 years and older. The theoretical framework was formulated using theories of Bourdiou، Inglehart، Habermas and Giddens. Social factors included social class، cultural capital، media usage، and religiosity. Descriptive findings reveal that majority of the Tehrani citizens have low tendency towards democracy. Only 4 percent of them have high level of tendency towards democracy. These citizens were more democratic in their attitudes than in their conducts. Explanatory findings show that there is significant relation among various dimensions of social class (i. e.، cultural capital، economic capital and social status) with the tendency towards democracy. In addition، there is also significant correlation between cultural factors (i. e.، social tolerance، social participation، democratic attitudes towards family) with the tendency towards democracy. Findings demonstrated that cultural capital was the most significant predictor of the dependent variable

Intellectual foundations and theoretical principles of the parties in the process of policy-making are of particular importance. So that,the effects of these principles could be seen during operational policies and observed in practices. Both reformists and fundamentalists parties inserted their ideological and intellectual principles as inputs in the foreign policy system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. After analysis in the system, which has its own set of principles and rules certain policies are carried out. By comparing the inputs that two parties inserted to the system and outputs that appeared we understand methods of two parties were different about the nuclear program but according to the general foreign policy principles of the system of Islamic Republic of Iran, their goal was identical. The purpose of this article is to review and analyze reformists and fundamentalists methods to achieve Peaceful nuclear program according to the system theory.

After collapsing the bipolar system، nature of the new international system was complicated. Due to this ambiguity، many Scenarios have been brought forward to explain future of the world system. In this regard، many scenarios such as unipolar، multi polar and uni- multi polar have been mentioned to clarify the future of the world system. This article tries to explain these questions: what is the most probable kind of world system and what is the role of Islamic world in such a system? To answer these questions the authors believe that the nature of current international system is in transitional mode from unipolar and uni-multi polar to multi-polar one. The main players of such a system beside the United States are rising powers like china، India، EU، Japan and the Islamic world. In this situation، the Islamic world because of its geopolitical، cultural، resources، great population، have the main role as a pole in future international system. This article has been written through analyticaldescriptive methods according to library resources.

After the end of the cold war and collapsing of the bipolar system، Germany has made significant changes in its foreign and security policy and has made itself ready to have an influential presence for international peace and security Preservation. This includes presence of German troops in Afghanistan after 11th of September 2001attacks and the overthrow of Taliban. Now the question is that what role Germany has played for establishing and Preservation of peace and security in Afghanistan? The results in this study indicate، despite the fact that the presence and active engagement of German troops in Afghanistan under NATO and ISAF has not succeeded in eradicating terrorism، but has enabled Afghan government in good governance، in reconstructing socio- economic structures as well as bringing partial peace in this Country.