پژوهشنامه انقلاب اسلامی
پیاپی 17 (زمستان 1394)

Bourdieu's sociological theory is the one presented for explaining conflicts in different social, cultural, economical and political fields and so is suitable for explaining some dimensions of revolution event in society. For him, the social universe is the site of endless and pitiless competition, in and through which arise the differences that are the stuff and stake of social existence. Contention, not stasis, is the ubiquitous feature of collective life. concepts Piety and justice, Imam, Jurisprudence, imitation, pure Islam, commitment, jihad, sacrifice, the fight against injustice and evil, general and special Imamate etc were the most important components of the clergy's cultural capital that has had a high social standing in iran. In this essay, with the help of basic concepts of Bourdieu sociological theory I try to explain, to some extent, Iran's developments of the years between 1961-1979. Obviously, the used method in the article is Bourdieu's constructivism. Finally, it is concluded that – considering cultural nature of Islamic revolution- Bourdieu's theory that is one generally prefers cultural concepts such as cultural capital, habitus and correlation of different fields of social life, can help us propose a new interpretation of some reasons and causes of the revolution. So, how to transform cultural capital of the clergy into economic one and the bazaar support financially and organizationally from the revolutionaries can be explained. Based on this theory we can show conflicts between two rival kinds of the habitus (western versus Islamic-Iranian) in a transitional society and its impacts on nativism discourse in this period. Also, the symbolic violence concepts versus physical one can explain another the sovereign power weakness against his opponents that were enjoyed of more powerful symbolic reservoir for mobilizing the masses. Thus we can explain why the clergy could have an upper hand in mobilizing people and its ideology pulled over the intellectual modern-secular discourse.

The purpose of this article is to identify different schooles in political science and according to that tell us the main Strategic principles for transformation in political science in I.R.Iran. Nowadays we have a lot of theories which try analysis political science in different countries but most of them are secular and because of this cannot give us a correct and perfect interpretation of Islamic political science. Author in this paper-by a comparative method- rely on Islamic discourse and show that political science in I.R.Iran shouhd be transformed in 4 eras;
1. Transformation from Hard politics to Soft politics.
2. Transformation from Monopolitics to Multidimensional politics.
3. Transformation from Politics of Power to Politics of Happiness and Prosperity.
4. Transformation from Egotist politics to Moralistic politics.

The purpose of this article is to indentify comparative the instruments and methods of mobilization and protest in the Islamic Revolution and the Russian Revolution. Methodology of this article is the comparison and documentary analysis. Gathering information, taking notes from books, articles and documents that contain information on topic. Understanding the instruments and methods of mobilization and protest in the Islamic revolution and the Russian revolution and to compare the revolutions in this respect, is important for the purpose of development and promotion of public awareness in this field.The research question is instrumens and methods of mobilization and protest in the Islamic revolution and the Russian revolution What similarities and differences with each other. According to the findings of the article some of the instruments and methods of mobilization such as speech , press and declarationand statement the revolutions in the two countries were used jointly with their differences and similarities. Instruments and methods such as audio cassette , pulpit, radio and myth-making were used only in the Islamic revolution and weren’t used in Russian revolution. About instruments and methods of protest these result obtaind: some of instruments and methods of protest such as demonstration, strikes, slogan, rebellion and military rebellion, attacks on property and premises, terrorism, armed struggle, sent a letter of protest, throwing objects at the police and regime officials were beaten, in both countries, the revolutionaries were used in a revolutionary situation and the differences and similarities. Instruments such as hunger strike, refuge, were used only during the Islamic revolution and Russian revolutionaries weren’t used. In the Russian holding meeting was one of the most common methods that weren’t used during the Islamic revolution.

the past 30 years or so trying to the issuance of the Islamic Revolution considerable achievements created for the Islamic Revolution, Iran should be a turning point in the prominent Islamic awakening in the region .slamic awakening of policy of issuing Islamic Revolution a process in other countries as well as their works to fit showed that the most important players in support of Islamic awakening has played a prominent role of the Islamic Republic of Iran as a result of the measures and seriously patiently in the issuance of the revolution is observed during the 36 years a variety of policy to promote the policy of has always been ignored by the authorities that the system has always opportunities and challenges has been accompanied policy of issuing Islamic Revolution , despite the intensity and weaknesses and landings in pursuit of all the cabinet formed . for the evaluation of the policy that the possibility of exporting the Islamic Revolution in an atmosphere that emanated from the current regional Islamic awakening process of Swat model ( SWOT ) has been used to Swat ( SWOT ) tool for recognition , threats and opportunities in the external environment for the policy of and recognition of the strengths and weaknesses in order to measure the internal situation and devise strategies for guidance and control the policies.This study attempts to be the political landscape and sociological Islamic awakening to study and to understand and systematic analysis of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the awakening considerable help will. the results of this study shows that of success in the way of achieving goals exporting revolution discourse realistic understanding of the situation is incorrect analysis of opportunities and threats on the one hand and strengths and weaknesses - associated with dialogue could undermine the issuance of the revolution and eventually amnesia dialogue issuing revolution.

The Islamic revolution in Iran undoubtedly has affected the political equations in islam world and more specifically in the Middle East . Accordingly, since the Islamic revolution in 1979, the conservative regimes in the Middle East especially Saudi Arabia have endeavored to confront the influence of Iranian revolution and prevent the revolution export which could endanger their traditional political regimes.in fact , the islamic revolution in iran has changed the alliances and coalitions in the Middle East. in fact at least in regard to the peace process between Arabs and Israel, two competing fronts namely resistance axil and the coalition of conservatives can be distinguised. Meanwhile, the civil wars in Iraq and Syria have complicated the situation and created new opportunities for conservatives Arabs to confront the Islamic revolution. in fact, arab apring or islamic awakening has affected the borders and geopolitics of the middle east and is a opportunity for many competing regional actors to develop their influence. The fundamental question of the present paper is as follows: how the approach of Saudi Arabia towards the civil wars of Iraq and Syria is linked to the Saudi Arabia confrontational approach towards Iran? The findings of the authors illustrate that Saudi Arabia is endeavoring to decrease the influence of Islamic revolution and the axis of resistance by adopting the regime change strategy in Syria and challenging the hegemony of Shiites in Iraq. The findings of the authors illustrate that Saudi Arabia is endeavoring to decrease the influence of Islamic revolution and the axis of resistance by adopting the regime change strategy in Syria and challenging the hegemony of Shiites in Iraq.